Effectiveness of Allowance of Auditor Travel Cost
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33827/akurasi2020.vol2.iss1.art63Keywords:
cost standard of input, official travel, The effectiveness of the policy, The performance of an auditAbstract
This study is lifted from the specific characteristics of official travel for the auditor compared to other official travel, so there is a need to determine the specificity of input cost standards. The purpose of this study is to look at the effectiveness of the policy of official travel costs especially allowance for auditors on the quality of performance and finance. The study was conducted with a qualitative approach. Respondents in this study were auditors from 4 inspectorate general units and 10 work units which were audited by the auditors (auditees). The results of this study indicate that the policy of official travel costs is still quite effective in supporting the implementation of supervision/ inspection. Supervision/inspection of auditors is also recognized to improve the quality of performance and financial auditees. It should be noted that the provision of an examination allowance in the same office location contrasts with the provision of performance allowances for auditors, although the allowance is one of the motivations for auditors to conduct audits at the head office.
References
Abidin, Said Zainal. (2012). Kebijakan publik edisi 2. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Efendi, Triani Meilawati. (2018). Pengaruh pengawasan internal terhadap kinerja pegawai di dinas tenaga kerja kota bandung. Bandung: Universitas Pasundan
Iqbal, Muhammad. (2017). Pemodelan perhitungan besaran uang harian perjalanan dinas dalam negeri. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Anggaran.
Kementerian Keuangan RI. (2018). PMK Nomor 32/PMK.02/2018 tentang Standar Biaya Masukan Tahun Anggaran 2019. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan RI.
Kementerian Keuangan RI. (2017). PMK Nomor 49/PMK.02/2017 tentang Standar Biaya Masukan Tahun Anggaran 2018. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan RI.
Kementerian Keuangan RI. (2016). PMK Nomor 227/PMK.05/2016 tentang Perubahan Atas PMK Nomor 164/PMK.05/2015 tentang Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Perjalanan Dinas Luar Negeri. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan RI.
Kementerian Keuangan RI. (2012). PMK Nomor 113/PMK.05/2012 tentang Perjalanan Dinas Dalam Negeri bagi Pejabat Negara, Pegawai Negeri, dan Pegawai Tidak Tetap. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan RI.
Kementerian PAN-RB RI. (2008). Peraturan Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Nomor PER/220/M.PAN/7/2008 tentang Jabatan Fungsional Auditor dan Angka Kreditnya. Jakarta : Kementerian PAN-RB RI.
Mahfudin, et al. (2018). Efektivitas dan efisiensi biaya uang harian perjalanan dinas dalam negeri. Jurnal Sistem Penganggaran Sektor Publik vol.2 no.1 https://doi.org/10.33827/akurasi2018.vol2.iss1.art34
Mahfudin. (2018). Efektivitas kebijakan standar biaya perjalanan dinas dalam menunjang kinerja kementerian negara/lembaga. Jurnal Sistem Penganggaran Sektor Publik vol.2 https://doi.org/10.33827/akurasi2018.vol2.iss2.art39
Miles, Mathew B. et al. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Singapore: Sage Publication Inc.
Republik Indonesia. (1990). PP Nomor 61 Tahun 1990 tentang Perjalanan Dinas Pimpinan dan Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Indonesia. Jakarta.
Tamasoleng, Adelstin. (2015). Analisis efektivitas pengelolaan anggaran di kabupaten kepulauan siau tagulandang biaro. Jurnal riset bisnis dan manajemen vol.3 no.1, p.97-110
Standar Biaya. (2012). Benchmarking Perjalanan Dinas ke Swasta dan BUMN. Direktorat Jenderal Anggaran
Steers, M Richard. (1985). Efektivitas organisasi perusahaan. Jakarta: Erlangga
Suharto, Edi. (2008). Kebijakan sosial sebagai kebijakan publik. Bandung: Alfabeta
Swandana, Anak Agung Nova. (2017). Pengaruh kebijakan at cost terhadap alokasi anggaran perjalanan dinas. Jurnal Sistem Penganggaran Sektor Publik vol.1 no.2 https://doi.org/10.33827/akurasi2017.vol1.iss2.art31
Wahyuni, Sari. (2015). Qualitative research method: Theory and practice 2nd edition. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
