Impact Evaluation of Government Asistance on the Improvement of Quality of Vocational Education

Authors

  • Aziz Wahyu Suprayitno Direktorat Jenderal Anggaran, Kementerian Keuangan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33827/akurasi2021.vol3.iss1.art91

Keywords:

impact evaluation, DID, quality of vocational education, government assistance

Abstract

This study evaluates the impact evaluation of Government Assistance on the improvement of Quality of Vocational Education. This study using the Difference in Difference (DID) method to estimate the effects of Government Assistance allocation by comparing the changes in outcome {quality of Vocational Education measured by School Quality Report (Rapor Mutu Sekolah) that contains a number with scale 1 – 7} between the Vocational High School that get Government Assistance (intervention/treatment group) and the Vocational High School that did not (control group), using regression model by testing parallel trend assumption first. Secondary data consists of Government Assistance and Vocational High School Quality Report for 2013 – 2018 from the Directorate of Vocational Education, Ministry of Education and Culture. Government Assistance data selected is only Assistance for facilities/infrastructure and Assistance for rehabilitation/construction of buildings using a purposive sampling technique. The results showed that the average value of the Vocational High Schools that received Government Assistance was higher by 0.0373 compared to Vocational High Schools that did not receive Government Assistance, after the intervention of Government Assistance from 2016 - 2018. That results indicates that Government Assistance has a positive impact on improving the Quality of Vocational Education.

Keywords : impact evaluation, DID, quality of vocational education, government assistance.

References

Allais, S.M. (2009). Quality Assurance in Education. Johannesburg: Centre for Education Policy Development.
Athey, S. dan Imbens, G.W. (2006). Identification and Inference in Nonlinear Difference-in-Difference Models. Econometrica, 74(2), 431 – 497.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2018). Agustus 2018: Tingkat Pengangguran Terbuka (TPT) sebesar 5,34 persen. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2018/11/05/1485/ agustus-2018--tingkat-pengangguran-terbuka--tpt--sebesar-5-34-persen.html
Billet, S. (2011). Vocational Education: Purposes, Traditions and Prospects. Germany: Springer Science+Business Media.
BPMPK, Kemendikbud. (2016). Bentuk-bentuk Ketimpangan Sosial dalam Masyarakat. Retrieved from https://m-edukasi.kemdikbud.go.id/medukasi/produk-files/kontenkm/km2016/ KM201628/materi1.html
Buckley, J. dan Shang, Y. (2002). Estimating Policy and Program Effects with Observational Data: The “Differences-in-Differences” Estimator. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 8, Article 24.
Clark, L. dan Winch, C. (2007). Vocational Education: International approaches, developments and systems. New York: Routledge.
Conley, T.G. dan Taber, C.R. (2011). Inference with “Difference In Differences” with A Small Number Of Policy Changes. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 113–125.
Cuttance, P. (1994). Quality Assurance in Education Systems. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20, 99 – 112.
Darmastuti, H. dan Karwanto. (2014). Manajemen Sarana dan Prasarana dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran pada Jurusan Teknik Komputer dan Informatika di SMK Negeri 2 Surabaya. Jurnal Inspirasi Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(3), 9 – 20.
Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. (2015). Rencana Strategis Direktorat Pembinaan SMK 2015 – 2019. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Jakarta.
Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menegah. (2016). Pedoman Umum Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Jakarta.
Dimick, J.B. dan Ryan, A.M. (2014). Methods for Evaluating Changes in Health Care Policy The Difference-in-Differences Approach. Clinical Review & Education, 312, 2401 – 2402.
Fadhli, M. (2017). Manajemen Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan. Jurnal Studi Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(2), 215 – 240.
Fisher, R.C. dan Papke, L.E. (2000). Local Government Responses to Education Grants. National Tax Journal, 53(1), 153 – 168.
Gertler, P.J. et al. (2016). Impact Evaluation in Practice (second edition). Washington DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
Hansen, B., Sabia, J.J., dan Rees, D.I. (2015). Cigarette Taxes and Youth Smoking: Update Estimates Using YRBS Data. Working Paper in National Bureau of Economic Research No. 21311. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hidayat, E. (2014). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Mutu Sekolah (Pengaruh dari Faktor Kinerja Mengajar Guru dan Pemanfaatan Sumber Belajar. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan UPI, 21(1), 81 – 88.
Khandker, S.R., Koolwal, G.B., dan Samad, H.A. (2010). Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices. Washington DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
Li, H., Graham, D.J., dan Majumdar, H. (2012). The Effects of Congestion Charging on Road Traffic Casualties: A Causal Analysis using Difference-in Difference Estimation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 49, 366 – 377.
Megasari, R. (2014). Peningkatan Pengelolaan Sarana dan Prasarana Pendidikan untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran di SMPN 5 Bukittinggi. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan FIP UNP, 2(1), 636 – 831.
Pelinescu, E. (2014). The impact of human capital on economic growth. Paper dipresentasikan pada 2nd International Conference ‘Economic Scientific Research - Theoretical, Empirical and Practical Approaches’, ESPERA 2014, 13-14 November 2014, Bucharest, Romania.
PH, Slamet. (2011). Peran Pendidikan Vokasi dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, No. 2.
Pischke, JS. (2005). Empirical Methods in Applied Economics: Lecture Notes. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
Puhani, P.A. (2011). The treatment effect, the cross difference, and the interaction term in nonlinear “difference-in-difference” models. Economics Letters, 115, 85 – 87.
Republik Indonesia. (2009). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 63 Tahun 2009 tentang Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta.
Republik Indonesia. (2015). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan RI Nomor 168/PMK.05/2015 tentang Mekanisme Pelaksanaan Anggaran Bantuan Pemerintah pada Kementerian Negara/Lembaga. Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. 2015.
Republik Indonesia. (2016). Instruksi Presiden RI Nomor 9 Tahun 2016 tentang Revitalisasi Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan dalam rangka Peningkatan Kualitas dan Daya Saing Sumber Daya Manusia Indonesia. Sekretariat Kabinet. Jakarta.
Republik Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebuayaan RI Nomor 28 Tahun 2016 tentang Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jakarta.
Ryan, A.M., Burgess, J.F., dan Dimick, J.B. (2015). Why We Should Not Be Indifferent to Specification Choices for Differencein-Differences. Health Services Research, 1 – 25.
Sekaran, Uma dan Bougie, Roger. (2013). Business Research Methods. Sixth Edition. Wiley.
Stuart, E.A. et al. (2014). Using propensity scores in difference-in-difference models to estimate the effects of a policy change. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 14, 166 – 182.
Suti, M. (2011). Strategi Peningkatan Mutu di Era Otonomi Pendidikan. Jurnal MEDTEK, 3(2).
Tony, K. (2019). Strategies to Improve Education Quality Through Facilities and Infrastructures Management in Singkawang Vocational School. Journal of Education, Teaching, and Learning, 4(2), 296 – 299.
Tukan, D.D. dan Parida, L. (2016). Persepsi dan Konsepsi Mutu Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar PerKhasa, 2(2).
Tjalla, A. (2010). Potret Mutu Pendidikan Indonesia Ditinjau dari Hasil-Hasil Studi Internasional. Paper dipresentasikan pada Temu Ilmiah Nasional Guru II: Membangun Profesionalitas Insan Pendidikan Yang Berkarakter dan Berbasis Budaya, 24–25 November 2010, Tangerang Selatan.
UNESCO. (2013). Revisiting global trends in TVET: Reflections on theory and practice. Germany: UNESCO-UNEVOC International Centre for Technical and Vocational Education and Training.
Usher, A. (2006). Grants for Students: What They Do, Why They Work. Toronto, ON: Educational Policy Institute
Wilson, R.A. dan Briscoe, G. (2004). The impact of human capital on economic growth: a review. Thessaloniki: Cedefop.
Wing, C., Simon, K., dan Bello-Gomez, R.A. (2018). Designing Difference in Difference Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research. Annual Review of Public Health, 39, 453 – 469.
World Economic Forum. (2016). World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2016: Mastering The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
Yolanda, F.Y. (2016). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Mutu Pendidikan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan di Kabupaten Sijunjung (Tesis). Padang: Universitas Andalas.
Yudi, A.A. (2012). Pengembangan Mutu Pendidikan Ditinjau dari Segi Sarana dan Prasarana (Sarana dan Prasarana PPLP). Jurnal Cerdas Sifa, (1).

Downloads

Published

2021-06-14